Tuesday, January 31, 2017

A Few Famous Muslims

Singer Janet Jackson

Singer Jermaine Jackson

Physician and TV personality Doctor Mehmet Oz

Comedian Dave Chappelle

Renowned lawyer (and George Clooney’s wife) Amal Clooney

Basketball player Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

Singer Cat Stevens

Basketball superstar Shaquille O’Neal

Boxer Mike Tyson

Rapper Snoop Dogg

Former One Direction singer Zayn Malik

Rapper Ice Cube

Actress Ellen Burstyn

Actress Angelina Jolie

Rapper Busta Rhymes

Disk jockey Casey Kasem

Malcolm X

Boxer Muhammad Ali

Actor Omar Sharif

Author Salman Rushdie

Fashion Model Iman

CNN host Fareed Zakaria

Political staffer Huma Abedin

Jazz musician Yusef Lateef

Sunday, January 29, 2017

The Ban

Donald Trump has not banned Muslims from entering the US. A ban based on religion would violate the US constitution. Instead, Trump has banned people from Muslim countries from entering the US. What, you can’t see the difference? Neither can most people.

Trump’s ban covers seven countries: Syria, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. But no one from any of those countries has ever committed a terrorist act in the US. That is, with one exception: in 2006 an Iranian-American drove his SUV into students at UNC. That attacker was born in Iran and brought to America at the age of two and is a naturalized US citizen. However, a two-year-old child is obviously not a jihadist, and the most extreme vetting could not have predicted the toddler would commit an act of terror 20 years in the future.

Where do terrorists come from? The 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Lebanon. The failed “shoe bomber” is British. The failed “underwear bomber” is Nigerian. The Boston marathon bombers came from Chechnya when they were less than 10 years old. Other attackers are Pakistani or Pakistani-American and Palestinian or Palestinian-American. Several attackers were born in America.

Terrorism has a long, hateful history in America. Rarely are acts of terror in America committed by Muslims. Most acts of terror are committed by Americans against Americans. In 1838, a law was passed making it legal to kill Mormons in Missouri. That law (known as the Extermination Order) was on the books until 1975. Terror attacks in America have been committed by anti-abortionists, “sovereign citizens”, racists, homophobes, anti-police, anti-government, and mentally disturbed individuals. Even the list of school shootings in the US is a long one, dating back to the Enoch Brown school massacre of 1764 – before America was a country. The 1999 Columbine shooters killed 13 and wounded 21 for no particular reason; those shooters were non-Muslim Americans. The 2007 Virginia Tech shooter killed 32 and wounded 17 for no particular reason; that shooter was a non-Muslim Korean. Most school shooters do have a reason for their deadly acts, but – as is true of terrorists in general – their reasons are as varied as the killers themselves.

In 2014, according to the CDC, there were 15,809 homicides including 10,945 homicides by firearms. If Trump truly wants to protect Americans, he should start with the obvious. A ban on immigrants from seven countries that have never sent us terrorists is illogical, will not help anyone, and may even bring about acts of terror just because the ban is good jihadi propaganda. It writes itself: “The ban proves America hates Muslims and is trying to destroy us, so join our fight to destroy America.”

Jihadists won’t destroy America, but Trump and his cronies may succeed at doing something the jihadists could never do: destroy America’s values.

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Trump Wall

It appears Trump's wall has already kept at least one Mexican out of the US. Mexico's president just cancelled a visit to Washington because Trump told him not to come if Mexico isn't going to pay for the Wall. That is Trump’s way of building good relations with our neighbors: just tell their leaders they’re not welcome here if they don’t agree to pay for our projects.

Given that in recent years more Mexicans have left the US than have entered the US, maybe Trump's secret agenda is to keep Mexicans in the US.

Building a border wall is part of Trump’s plan to “make America great again.” It’s probably just a coincidence, but in the 1930s Adolf Hitler promised to "make Germany great again." (Article)

Border walls have been built for thousands of years, with mixed results at best. Prior to World War Two, France feared a German invasion so they built a wall, of sorts. It was a line of impregnable fortifications called the Maginot Line. But we all know how well it worked to keep the Germans out of Paris. The German army didn’t attack the Maginot Line. They conquered France by going around the Maginot Line. 

How about the Great Wall of China? It failed miserably. It is written that the Great Wall "has been about as useful to China as a Bible on a battlefield. It can give you comfort, but it just won’t stop the enemy."

In fact, can you think of any famous wall that has good connotations? What do you think of when you hear the words, “Berlin Wall”?

General George Patton, a man noted for his perspicacity regarding strategy, has been quoted as saying, "Fixed fortifications are a monument to the stupidity of man." Of course, maybe he was wrong and Trump's wall will work just fine. (Is there an emoticon for sarcasm?)

The term "Trump Wall" may eventually enter the lexicon as a term meaning outrageously expensive yet worthless. As in, "That new jet fighter is just another Trump Wall."

The US-Mexico border is almost 2000 miles long and runs through trackless desert and desolate mountains. For a little perspective, imagine building a tall, impregnable wall studded with electronic sensors all the way from Richmond, Virginia, to Miami, Florida. Then, when you reach Miami, you turn around and build another wall all the way from Miami to Richmond. That’s about 2000 miles, and it doesn’t run through deserts or mountains.

To fulfill Trump’s vision, not only must we build a wall, we must also build a 2000 mile road to haul building materials, fuel, food, water, and all the other things the workers will need. And remember, it's not just a wall. It's also video cameras, infrared cameras, microphones, anti-tunneling vibration sensors, and more. And of course, what's the point of having a wall if the nearest border patrol agents are hours away? There will have to be barracks built along the border to house border patrol personnel. For most barracks, water will have to be hauled to them regularly, or a pipeline must be built. Electricity (and probably internet connectivity for surveillance equipment) must also be supplied. The projected cost is said to be ten billion dollars. I would wager it will cost far more, as is the usual case for big government projects.

But wait; there’s more. The cost of building the wall won’t end when the wall is built. The cost will go on and on into the future. There will be maintenance; people will cut holes in the wall, tunnel under it, and vandalize sensors.

Here’s what it comes down to: the wall will be very expensive, it won’t prevent illegal immigration, and guess who’s going to foot the bill for it. Trump has already changed his tune from “Mexico will pay for the wall” to “US taxpayers will pay for the wall and Mexico will reimburse us.” If you think that’s going to happen, then you should see the bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn. Trump’s next assurance will probably be something like, “American taxpayers will pay the entire cost but it will be worth it.”

We taxpayers will pay for the wall. The cost may be hidden; it may take the form of crumbling bridges, potholes in our highways, and decrepit airports. Frankly, I’d prefer a line item on my tax form – an item called Wall Fee. When Trump bills us for the wall, the least he can do is tell us – every one of us – how much we’re really paying for it.

Thursday, January 19, 2017

Thursday, January 5, 2017

Buffy versus Shadowhunters

There is a new series on TV called Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments. It debuted in 2015 and is, or will soon be, in it’s third season. IMDB reviewers rate the show 6.3 out of 10, so it must be a good show. IMDB says this about this show:

Clary Fray is a normal teenager living in Brooklyn with her mother. One day, she discovers that she is descended from a line of Shadowhunters; humans born with angelic blood that fight to protect our world from demons. After her mother is kidnapped, Clary must team up with three Shadowhunters: Jace, Alec and Isabelle and her best friend Simon on a quest to find her mother and recover her past.

Why does this storyline sound so very familiar? Let’s compare it to another show that aired from 1997 to 2003 – a show called Buffy the Vampire Slayer. IMDB reviewers rate that show 8.2 out of 10, so it must be a very good show. (The synopsis is mine, but fans of the show can verify its accuracy.)

Buffy Summers is a normal teenager living in Sunnydale with her mother. One day, she discovers that she is the latest in a long line of Slayers: girls born with special powers to protect our world from demons. With the help of her three friends, Willow, Xander, and Cordelia, and her watcher Giles, she pursues her destiny: fighting vampires and demons, all the while struggling to live a normal teenage life of heartbreak and drama.

Wow. Is it me, or do those two plotlines sound almost identical?

I was about 15 years old when I submitted my first short story to a magazine. I received the manuscript back with a note that read, “Get some fresh ideas.”

Fresh ideas might have been important to magazine publishers back in the day, but Hollywood doesn’t run on fresh ideas. Hollywood runs on retreaded plots and rehashed characters. It runs on spinoffs and sequels and prequels. And that’s why I don’t watch a lot of TV. It’s why I “cut the cord” and hooked up an antenna. Almost every show has a whiff of “We’ve been here before.” It’s like the same dead body dressed in a different suit every week. After a while it’s going to smell, no matter how nice the suit.

I suppose being original was easier in the days when there were fewer TV networks. Hollywood writers had only a few hours of airtime to pour their writing talent into. Now there are hundreds of TV channels and thousands of shows, and creative talent is of necessity spread thin. Fewer ideas are original, and more ideas are derivative.

But maybe there’s an upside here. As TV becomes less interesting, books may see a revival. Books are, after all, the last bastion of original thought – something that some people still consider desirable.

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Almost an Elvis

I recently saw a Panera bread advertisement on YouTube that showed a peanut butter, bacon, and honey sandwich. The sandwich looked oh-so tasty. (The ad is here.) Throw in some sliced banana and you’ll have yourself an Elvis. Although, technically, I don’t think you need honey to make an Elvis.

When I saw the add I thought to myself, “Ooh, I have to try that.”

Like most people (I assume), I’ve had my share of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. I’ve also eaten peanut butter and banana sandwiches, with peanut butter on one slice of bread and mayonnaise on the other. They’re really good. Not Michelin Guide good, of course, but still good. It never crossed my mind to add crisp, fried bacon to the mix.

The closest I came to a peanut butter and bacon sandwich happened when I was in the 8th grade. I had a taste for peanut butter and baloney sandwiches. Every morning I made my school lunch: white bread with peanut butter and a slice of baloney right out of the package. Plus a moon pie. It’s gastronomic heaven – if you’re a 14 year old boy.

Sometimes I prepared fried baloney as a meal for one. And sometimes I would put the fried baloney on a plate and spread peanut butter on it and then roll it up like a fat, meaty joint. Baloney was the Zig-Zag paper and peanut butter was the weed. That PB and baloney combo was good, too. You really can’t mess up peanut butter and baloney. You can’t do much to make it worse, and you can do little to make it better. It is what it is.

But peanut butter, bacon, and honey – that’s another critter, and as it turns out, a popular one. So I had to investigate it.

All I had on hand was whole wheat bread. I like whole wheat bread so that wasn’t an issue. I had real peanut butter in the fridge. The ingredient list for real peanut butter states “Ingredients: peanut butter, salt.” (Look at the ingredients in your favorite brand of peanut butter.) Why keep it in the fridge? Because if you don’t, real peanut butter soon separates into peanuts and oil. And finally, I had low-sodium bacon in the fridge. Unfortunately, I had no honey and didn’t feel like buying a jar of honey for this one taste test.

I toasted the bread and nuked the bacon. I smeared PB on the two slices of toast and added the bacon. I glommed the two slices of bread together, trapping the bacon inside, and I ate the PB and bacon sandwich. The verdict? Good, but not as good as a PB and baloney sandwich. Sorry, Panera. You tried, but when it comes to junk food, it’s difficult for even the best chef to match the gustatory delights dreamed up by a 14 year-old boy.

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Post New Year

On this third morning of 2017, I awaken at 2 AM, as usual. Not that I always awaken at that specific time, but I always awaken at some point during the middle of the night – sometimes before midnight, sometimes after. Often, I’ll get up for a few hours then return to bed. But tonight I don’t feel like getting out of bed so early, so I lie in bed and listen to the rain hitting the roof. Occasionally, I glance at the clock beside my bed. When it says 5:00, I get up.

It’s dark and still raining. The forecast calls for rain all day and all night – just like yesterday. A gray day will soon be dawning. But I have a 9 AM appointment with my cardiologist, and I have prepping to do. I don’t want to be late for my appointment, so a four hour head start should insure that I’m not.

I shower. I shave. I even shave my chest and stomach. My torso is just a bit hairy, and when the cardiologist’s nurse yanks those EKG electrodes off me, they take hair with them. There are 12 leads on the EKG machine, so that’s 12 tufts of hair to be yanked out. Shaving my front allows the EKG pads to stick to my skin better, and bonus, also reduces the amount of hair that gets pulled out by the roots.

I dress. I sit in my living room, watching dismal world events unfold on the TV news, until 6:30. Then I get up and fix breakfast. I scramble two eggs and pour them into a hot skillet. I sprinkle the soon-to-be omelet with shredded cheese. I wait a few minutes and then carefully fold the egg mixture into an omelet. This is the point where half the time the omelet tears or breaks in half, but this time the magic works and I end up with an omelet-shaped omelet. I nuke two pre-cooked sausage links in the microwave oven. I go to the living room and sit in front of the TV, where I watch something completely forgettable while eating my breakfast. When I finish, the clock reads 7 AM.

I dress, pulling on freshly washed jeans and a heavy-knit shirt. I put on shoes and socks. The rain has let up and is now just a falling mist, so I take a bag of kitchen garbage out to the wheelie-bin behind my house. I go back into the house and this time I remember to turn off the backyard flood lights. I remember to do that about one in every twenty trips outside at night.

I look at some internet news and then decide to watch a one-hour video that I have on my computer. So I do that, and when I finish, the time is 8:30. It doesn’t take long to drive to the doctor’s office. I decide to leave at 8:45 so I’ll have 15 minutes to get there. Feeling the need to pee, and not knowing how long I’ll wait to see the doc, I go to the bathroom and try to pee. Although I feel like I have to go, not a drop comes out. “Sacrebleu!” I swear in 19th century French. “Is this the beginning of a urinary tract infection or did my prostate explode during the night?! Oy vey.” (I also swear in Yiddish. Yiddish is timeless.)

I pull on my coat, pop a baseball cap onto my head, and grab my umbrella. An umbrella may look dorky, but dressing fashionably cool is the last thing on my mind. I just want to stay dry.

I drive to the doctor’s office, getting there in plenty of time for my 9 AM appointment. I go to the appointment window to check in. The young lady on the other side of the window asks, “Who are you here to see?”

“Dr. Pathak,” I answer.

“He’s not here,” she says.

“Not here? I have a 9 AM appointment today.”

“Dr. Pathak isn’t here,” she repeats, adding, “He’s on vacation this week. Your appointment has been re-scheduled to the tenth. It’s at ten o’clock. Do you want an appointment card.”

“No – ten on the tenth. Got it.”

It would have been nice if someone had called me and told me that the appointment had been rescheduled. But there’s no point in getting upset about it. Shit happens, and always will.

I go to my car. To make the trip not a complete waste of time, I drive to the grocery store in the shopping center next door. I peruse the shelves, looking for something tasty but not overly unhealthy. “Oooh, fried chicken strips!” I pull the package out of the freezer and look at the nutrition label. “If this is three and a half servings, I’m a one-eyed sea monkey.” The label says the chicken strips contain four thousand milligrams of sodium – enough to elevate my blood pressure to what doctors call “the exploding-head threshold.” I put the package back in the freezer.

Next, I put a bag of potato chips into my cart, after first dropping the bag onto the floor, shattering half the chips inside. I could put the bag back on the shelf and get another bag, but I broke ‘em, so I’ll buy ‘em.

Next, I put a wheel of cooked shrimp into my cart. This is one of those round plastic platters: a circular serving of shrimp with a little well of shrimp sauce in the center. I’ve bought them before and they’re good. On the way to my car I, of course, drop the bag with a loud smack into a puddle of rainwater in the parking lot. But no worries. I know those shrimp are sealed up in that little round package tighter than the gold in Fort Knox. It will take twenty minutes with razor-sharp implements to break into that package.

Next, I go to the bread section. The shelf-stocker is there stocking shelves. “Do you have sourdough bread?” I ask.

He points. “Right there. Sourdough. Read it. Are you stupid?”

“Thank you for your help,” I reply and grab a loaf.

“Arrrrgh,” he snarls back. This could be my imagination, but I seem to recall he had an eye patch and a hook for one hand.

Eventually, I wheel my cart to the self-checkout line. My checkout machine turns out to be one of those that, on every third item I scan, tells me to remove the last item from the bag and scan it. Fortunately, at that time of morning the store isn’t busy, and there is a young woman overseeing the self-checkout machines, so every time there is a glitch, I turn around and look at her forlornly. She doesn’t have to ask me what’s wrong. She knows the quirks of every machine, so she can clear up the problem quickly. Or could, were she not distracted by the conversation she’s having with another young woman standing near her.

“Oh la vache!” I mutter in 21st century French. That is a real French curse. It translates as, “Oh the cow!”

Wait – the cow? Yes, the cow. Who can figure out the French?

Sunday, January 1, 2017

McCarran-Walter Act

I have received multiple emails from right-wing friends referencing the McCarran-Walter Act, a.k.a. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 US Code Law 1182). The point of the email is that all Muslims “should or could be refused immigration to our country”  and asks the reader “what do you say about all of the criticism that Donald Trump received” from ordering a travel ban. What follows is my usual response.

Long before McCarran-Walter, President Hoover and the State Department essentially shut down immigration during the Great Depression as immigration went from 236,000 in 1929 to 23,000 in 1933. This was accompanied by voluntary repatriation to Europe and Mexico, and coerced repatriation and deportation of between 500,000 and 2 million Mexican Americans, mostly citizens, in the Mexican Repatriation.

Briefly, 8 US Code Law 1182 says:

“Inadmissible aliens: defines inadmissible aliens with health-related communicable diseases, conviction of certain crimes, multiple criminal convictions, controlled substance traffickers, prostitution and commercialized vice, certain aliens involved in serious criminal activity who have asserted immunity from prosecution, foreign government officials who have committed particularly severe violations of religious freedom, significant traffickers in persons, and money laundering if the Attorney General has reason to believe that the alien is engaged in terrorist activities, immigrant membership in totalitarian party [at the time, this was listed as Communist], participants in Nazi persecution, genocide, or the commission of any act of torture or extrajudicial killing, association with terrorist organizations, and recruitment or use of child soldiers, to name but a few of the details.”

While it was passed in 1952 and parts of the original Act remain, it has been amended many times and was modified substantially to become the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965. It was this modified act that President Carter referred to in 1980 when he banned Iranians from entering the United States.

What Carter did was part of a larger program to pressure the Iranian regime in order to secure the release of American hostages without military intervention. In contrast, Trump's proposal comes in response to a mass shooting perpetrated by an American citizen and his immigrant wife. While President Carter targeted individuals by nationality, Trump’s plan targets individuals by ideology. Law experts say that Trump's plan would very likely be ruled unconstitutional.

Furthermore, regarding the Koran forbidding allegiance to the US Constitution, you may recall the kerfuffle when Trump lashed out at the Gold Star Muslim-American parents whose son was killed while serving in the US military in Iraq. There are many Muslims and children of Muslim immigrants who put their lives on the line to defend American values. Beyond dying to protect us from our enemies, I don't know what else Muslims could do to show their allegiance.

By the way, banning any particular religious group from entering the US would violate several parts of the Constitution, specifically the First Amendment's Religion Clauses and the equality dimension of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment; it would also conflict with the spirit of the No Religious Test Clause of Article VI. 

Cornell Law professor Michael Dorf, an expert in constitutional law, said that while U.S. policy ‘routinely applies different immigration rules for nationals of different countries,’ Trump’s proposal to only exclude ‘foreign nationals who are Muslim’ would likely be ‘unconstitutional.’

Stanford Law professor Jenny Martinez, an expert in international law, said ‘Excluding all people of a particular religion from entering the country on the sole basis of their religion would, in my view, clearly violate the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection.’

Furthermore, an attempt to ban Muslims from the US would play right into the hands of jihadi propagandists. And how would we know that an immigrant was Muslim? Trump says an immigration office would ask them, "Are you Muslim?" How easy would that be to get around?  If a terrorist was intent on harming us, do you think he would answer truthfully?"

I'm all for banning individuals from our country if their intent is to harm us. But banning individuals according to their religion would be un-American and most likely destined to fail. We have to be smarter about it. There are similar problems with many of Trump's proposals: they are a knee-jerk reaction to a situation and are too simplistic, or too illegal, or too expensive, or too impractical to implement.